In one paragraphArticle in Cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
20 authors.
Chen WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, PR China.ORCID 0009-0005-6281-7440 Ting SunLaboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, PR China.ORCID 0009-0007-4771-4835 Yufei HeLaboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, PR China.ORCID 0009-0002-7469-8459 Chang-Qing PanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, PR China.ORCID 0009-0008-4809-1550 Yishuo SunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, PR China.ORCID 0009-0007-3051-1580 Di WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, PR China.ORCID 0009-0009-1545-1641 Zhongliang CuiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, PR China.ORCID 0009-0007-8299-0878 Jiazheng ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, PR China.ORCID 0009-0005-5184-1488 You ZhaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, PR China.ORCID 0009-0001-6110-5776 Ziwei LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, PR China.ORCID 0009-0004-7539-8540 Young Taek OhDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon-Si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8356-2428 Tao JiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, PR China.ORCID 0000-0002-7008-6351 Zhiyuan XuLaboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, PR China.ORCID 0009-0000-4196-1789 Guanzhang LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, PR China.ORCID 0000-0002-0353-5751 Jing ZhangLaboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, PR China.ORCID 0000-0001-8549-3286 Wei ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, PR China.ORCID 0000-0001-7800-3189 Funding
Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars No. 055Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding Support (Beijing Hospitals Authority Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding Support) ZLRK202333Beijing Municipal Health Commission (BMHB) BRWEP2024W032040200Beijing Municipal Health Commission (BMHB) JYY2023-2Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program JWZQ20240101026Capital Medical University (CCMU) A2205Fundamental Research Funds for the General UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 82525053Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality () JQ24057Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality () Z250008the Dengfeng Talents Program of Beijing Hospitals Authority DFL20240503the Yangfan Program of Beijing Hospitals Authority ZLRK202314Youth Thousand Scholar Program of China
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant intracranial tumor in adults, with a median survival of only 16 to 20 months. Neoantigen therapy has shown advantages in the treatment of GBM, as it improves the immunosuppressive microenvironment within the tumor. However, the identification of truly immunogenic neoantigens remains a major challenge. Current computational prediction tools primarily focus on antigen presentation, whereas algorithms that incorporate T-cell immunogenicity features remain limited. Furthermore, standard validation methods, such as enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assays, lack physiologic relevance and do not fully recapitulate the tumor microenvironment. In this study, we developed a neoantigen prediction algorithm, TCRscore, based on publicly available datasets by integrating human leukocyte antigen binding and T-cell receptor (TCR) recognition features. Twenty-one patient-derived GBM organoid models were established from isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type tumors to validate the performance of the algorithm. Predicted neoantigens were evaluated using ELISpot assays, flow cytometry, and in vitro killing assays based on organoid-T cell coculture systems. TCRscore outperformed six existing tools in predicting immunogenic neoepitopes. The organoid models retained the key histologic and transcriptomic features of parental tumors and provided an effective platform for functional validation. Coculture assays confirmed that neoantigen-specific T cells could induce targeted killing in GBM organoids. In particular, the analysis identified that the recurrent PIK3R1G376R mutation contributed to a potential shared neoantigen in GBM. Overall, by integrating TCRscore with organoid-based validation, this study provides a high-fidelity, high-quality GBM neoantigen database with significantly enhanced prediction accuracy. SIGNIFICANCE: A clinically impactful framework that integrates a TCR-aware AI algorithm with glioblastoma organoids enables accurate neoantigen prediction and validation, advancing both personalized and population-level immunotherapy strategies.
Indexed as
Antigens, NeoplasmBrain NeoplasmsDeep LearningGlioblastomaGliomaMutationOrganoidsAlgorithmsHumansImmunoinformaticsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesTumor MicroenvironmentAntigens, NeoplasmReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell
Identifiers
PMID41886621
PMCPMC13266343
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390