Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41886601›Full record

ArticleObesity facts2026

The Association between the Obesogenic Environment and BMI Independent of Familial Factors: A Cross-Sectional Twin Study.

Bram J Berntzen, Joline W J Beulens, Jeroen Lakerveld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity facts, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bram J BerntzenDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, b.j.berntzen@amsterdamumc.nl.
Joline W J BeulensDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeroen LakerveldDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo investigate the association between the obesogenic environment and body mass index (BMI), independent of familial factors shared by twins (e.g., genetic and early life environmental factors).

methodsThis cross-sectional twin study included 2,764 adults (77% female, 72% monozygotic [MZ], mean age 40 [SD 14]) from the Dutch Twin Registry. The Obesogenic Built Environment CharacterisTics (OBCT) index was used as neighborhood "obesogenic" exposure, integrating food-environment healthiness, walkability, drivability, and sports facilities within a 1,000 m Euclidean buffer around the residential address. Univariate twin models established the heritability estimates of the OBCT-index and BMI. Full-informed maximum likelihood linear regressions determined individual and pairwise difference (i.e., within-twin-pair differences in outcome and exposure) associations between the OBCT-index and BMI.

resultsThe heritability of the OBCT-index was 9% and common environmental factors explained 27% of its variation, whereas the BMI heritability was 75%. Living in a 10% higher OBCT-index environment was associated with a mean [95% CI] 0.15 [0.07, 0.24] kg/m2 higher BMI in all twin individuals. However, this association was nonsignificant in the MZ and same-sex DZ twin pairwise difference analyses.

conclusionThis study found a small association between a more obesogenic environment and a higher BMI, yet the association was explained by familial confounding. Future research in larger, more environmentally diverse international twin cohorts is needed to elucidate gene-environment interactions.

Indexed as

AdultsExposomeObesityObesogenic environmentTwins

Identifiers

PMID41886601
PMCPMC13241167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.