Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41886534›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Spatial proximity to national 5A tourist attractions and corporate environmental governance: Evidence from China.

Xiancheng Xiong, Chen Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiancheng XiongSchool of Economics, Management and Law, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7519-5357
Chen ZhongSchool of Economics, Management and Law, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tourism development is increasingly linked to both regional economic activity and environmental outcomes. However, empirical evidence remains limited on whether and through which channels proximity to major tourist attractions is associated with the environmental governance of industrial enterprises. Using enterprise-level data and geocoded locations of China's national 5A tourist attractions in 2014, we examine the relationship between firms' spatial proximity to 5A attractions and corporate environmental governance. We find that (1) proximity to 5A attractions is positively related to the environmental governance of nearby firms, and the results are robust across alternative specifications and a range of robustness checks, including IV-based estimates; (2) proximity is associated with lower operating costs, consistent with shared transportation infrastructure and environmental facilities, and with higher fixed-asset intensity that is linked to stronger environmental governance; and (3) the positive relationship is more pronounced for natural-landscape attractions and less pronounced in cities with higher innovation or marketization. These findings provide evidence consistent with positive environmental spillovers associated with tourism and underscore the potential value of coordinating tourism development strategies with industrial environmental governance policies.

Indexed as

EnvironmentIndustryTourismChinaCommerceConservation of Natural ResourcesHumans

Identifiers

PMID41886534
PMCPMC13020851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.