ArticlePloS one2026
Engagement of primary care physicians in medication decision-making for patients with multimorbidity in China: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManaging medications for patients with multimorbidity is complex and often leads to medication-related problems. Primary care physicians (PCPs) play a critical role in optimizing medication use but face considerable challenges and research on their practices remains limited. This study aimed to examine PCPs' medication decision-making practices for patients with multimorbidity, identify associated factors, and explore perceived difficulties.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among PCPs in five regions of Zhejiang, China, using a self-administered questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to assess PCPs' engagement in medication decision-making and their perceived difficulties. Linear regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with PCPs' overall engagement of medication decision-making practices.
resultsA total of 346 valid responses were included in the final analysis. PCPs showed limited engagement in eliciting patient preferences and addressing individual concerns. Perceived difficulties included difficulties in understanding complex medication regimens and adverse reactions, evaluating overall benefits and risks, and discussing treatment alternatives. Linear regression analysis revealed that daily outpatient volume (B = -0.046, 95% CI: -0.083 to -0.008), prior training in medication use (B = 5.764, 95% CI: 1.559 to 9.969), and collaboration with pharmacists (B = 7.048, 95% CI: 3.313 to 10.782) were significantly associated with more appropriate decision-making practices.
conclusionWhile many PCPs reported general engagement in medication decision-making, gaps remain in managing complex therapies and delivering patient-centered care. Targeted pharmaceutical training and strengthened interprofessional collaboration may support PCPs in improving medication decisions for patients with multimorbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.