ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Energy landscape statistics and thermodynamics of a machine-learned model of water.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Energy landscape statistics and thermodynamics of a machine-learned model of water.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Water's anomalous thermodynamic behavior arises from the presence of intricate hydrogen-bond networks that are highly sensitive to many-body interactions, challenging molecular modeling for decades. The ongoing machine learning revolution has opened the possibility of performing quantum-accurate liquid-structure calculations at affordable computational cost. Beyond reproducing water's thermodynamic properties with high fidelity, such simulations provide a stringent benchmark for theoretical models and a route to deeper physical understanding. We use the recently developed machine-learned Deep Potential Many-Body Polarizable water model to show that the free energy of supercooled water can be accurately modeled with the potential energy landscape formalism. The resulting equation of state predicts the presence of a liquid-liquid critical point in excellent agreement with recent estimates. Together with previous studies based on empirical classical water potentials, it confirms that the potential energy landscape of water is Gaussian, providing a unifying framework for extracting thermodynamic behavior across model complexity, from empirical force fields to quantum-trained neural network models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.