ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Multigenerational and gender-symmetric transmission of migration behaviors in historical Quebec.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multigenerational and gender-symmetric transmission of migration behaviors in historical Quebec.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Migration decisions are embedded in social and family trajectories that escape traditional data sources, which tend to observe individuals in isolation. Genealogical microdata now make it possible to trace these dynamics over long time horizons. This paper documents how prior generations' migration histories shape future internal migration behavior, leveraging rich historical microdata spanning over two centuries and multiple generations at the scale of an entire population (Quebec, Canada; 1621-1861). As the cultural norm preserved women's maiden names throughout the life course, genealogies could be assembled as exhaustively for women as for men. Using residential trajectories reconstructed from these linked vital data, the study shows that the mobility of married couples depends on both spouses' parents' and grandparents' migration histories. Descendants of migratory people are substantially more likely than their peers from sedentary families to migrate themselves, the effect of the grandparental generation being about half that of the parental generation. These effects compound such that couples with multiple migratory ascendants are even more likely to migrate. Moreover, husbands' and wives' migration backgrounds are equally predictive of their joint mobility decisions, suggesting a substantial role of women in shaping couples' mobility and challenging the conventional assumption that migration decisions were historically made by men. These results reveal deep family history as an underexplored axis of migrant selection. The long-lasting influence of family should be integrated in migration theories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.