ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Large future genetic diversity losses are predicted from conservation indicators even with habitat protection.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic diversity within species underpins evolutionary adaptation and has recently been included as a target for protection in the United Nations' Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). Yet, we lack mathematical tools to estimate past genetic diversity loss across species-or predict future losses-based on demographic proxies used in conversation policy. To fill this gap, we developed a spatiotemporal framework to predict the dynamics of genetic diversity under realistic habitat change scenarios, calibrated with population-scale genomic data from 29 plant and animal species. To estimate how much genetic diversity has already been lost, we analyzed habitat area and population size losses for 4,611 species from the last five decades, using data from the Living Planet Index, the Red List, and new GBF indicators. We estimate that species have already lost 1 to 13% of π genetic diversity. Furthermore, we predict that genetic diversity losses lag behind population and habitat area declines, such that an average of 6 to 45% of genetic diversity will be lost under different scenarios even if population sizes or habitats do not decline further. Our results highlight that safeguarding existing habitats is insufficient to maintain the genetic health of species, and that genetic monitoring from proxy indicators will only detect major genetic diversity losses after it is already too late.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.