Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41886246›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2026

Detection of Ehrlichia canis in Rhipicephalus sanguineus and Dermacentor marginatus from sylvatic environments in Southern Italy.

Gerardo Picazio, Lorena Cardillo, Alessia Pucciarelli, Giovanni Sgroi, Vincenzo Veneziano, Maurizio Viscardi, Loredana Cozzolino, Nicola D'Alessio, Stefania Cavallo, Marco Esposito and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Gerardo PicazioDepartment of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Via Salute, 2, Portici, Naples, 80055, Italy.
Lorena CardilloDepartment of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Via Salute, 2, Portici, Naples, 80055, Italy. lorena.cardillo@izsmportici.it.
Alessia PucciarelliDepartment of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Via Salute, 2, Portici, Naples, 80055, Italy.
Giovanni SgroiDepartment of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Via Salute, 2, Portici, Naples, 80055, Italy.
Vincenzo VenezianoWildlife Observatory of the Campania region, Naples, Italy.
Maurizio ViscardiDepartment of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Via Salute, 2, Portici, Naples, 80055, Italy.
Loredana CozzolinoDepartment of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Via Salute, 2, Portici, Naples, 80055, Italy.
Nicola D'AlessioDepartment of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Via Salute, 2, Portici, Naples, 80055, Italy.
Stefania CavalloRegional Observatory of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Naples, Italy.
Marco EspositoU.O.D. Prevention and Public Health, Campania Region, Naples, Italy.
Esterina De CarloNational Reference Centre for Hygiene and Technologies of Water Buffalo Farming and Productions, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Salerno, Italy.
Giovanna FuscoDepartment of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Via Salute, 2, Portici, Naples, 80055, Italy.
Claudio de MartinisDepartment of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Via Salute, 2, Portici, Naples, 80055, Italy.

Funding

Ministero della Salute C75E22000390001Regione Campania Decreto Dirigenziale Giunta Regionale della Campania n. 498 del 15.12.2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) represent an increasing threat to both human and animal health, driven by the expanding distribution and abundance of tick populations, even in regions traditionally considered unsuitable for their development. Among TBPs, Ehrlichia canis is primarily known as the causative agent of canine ehrlichiosis, mainly transmitted by the brown dog tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus. However, recent evidence indicates a broader host range, including potential zoonotic transmission to humans. In this study, adult ticks were collected from carcasses of domestic and wild animals and tested in pools of 5 specimens by real-time PCR to detect E. canis, aiming to assess infection rates and identify animal species potentially involved in transmission dynamics. Minimum Infection Rate (MIR) was used as a conservative estimate of pathogen prevalence in pooled samples showing an overall prevalence of 2.75%. As expected, R. sanguineus showed the highest positivity rate (MIR = 3.41%), with specimens collected from dogs and wolves, while no E. canis DNA was detected in ticks from red foxes. Interestingly, E. canis DNA was also detected in 2.61% of Dermacentor marginatus collected from wild boars and roe deer, whereas Ixodes ricinus specimens tested negative. These findings suggest that D. marginatus may be involved in the local circulation of E. canis or possibly reflect pathogen acquisition during earlier developmental stages or co-feeding on other infected hosts rather than active vector competence. Given that D. marginatus is among the most anthropophilic ixodid species, its potential role in E. canis transmission may represent a possibly underestimated risk for human exposure.

Indexed as

DermacentorEhrlichia canisEhrlichiosisRhipicephalus sanguineusAnimalsDogsItalyPrevalenceReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionDermacentor marginatusDomestic animalsMolecular detectionVector-borne diseasesWildlife

Identifiers

PMID41886246
PMCPMC13021812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.