ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2026
The Impact and Effectiveness of a Two-Dose Varicella Immunization Program Among School Children: Evidence from Quasi-experimental Analyses.
Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionVaricella, caused by the varicella zoster virus, poses a significant public health challenge, particularly among children. To address this, the city of Shenzhen, China, introduced a publicly funded vaccination program offering free two-dose varicella vaccines to eligible school-aged cohorts. This study aims to evaluate the program's impact on disease incidence, vaccination uptake, and the comparative effectiveness of two-dose versus single-dose regimens.
methodsWe used the individual-level data from official immunization and surveillance systems, covering pupils born between 1 September 2014 and 31 August 2015. Applying a difference-in-differences approach, we compared the disease incidence and vaccination uptake between the eligible cohort and ineligible cohort. Additionally, to further evaluate the effectiveness of the two-dose vaccination schedule, we implemented a regression discontinuity design using the policy cutoff date.
resultThe policy reduced varicella incidence by 22.96% (95% CI 8.98-34.79%, p < 0.05) in the eligible cohort relative to the ineligible one, while boosting first- and second-dose coverage by 34.97% (95% CI 28.19-2.11%, p < 0.05) and 98.05% (95% CI 91.98-104.31%, p < 0.05), respectively. The regression discontinuity design indicated that the two-dose schedule conferred 75.19% (95% CI 70.62-79.06%) relative vaccine effectiveness against breakthrough varicella after a single dose. This study's main limitation is that, while reporting of varicella cases is mandatory, underreporting and misdiagnosis remain possible, potentially underestimating true incidence.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate the program's success in reducing disease burden and enhancing immunization rates, underscoring the superior protection of two-dose vaccination and providing strong evidence for policymakers to expand such initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.