ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Shaping the future of breast surgery training in Italy: insights from a national survey.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast surgery is a cornerstone of breast cancer (BC) treatment and has distinctive features that distinguish it from other subspecialties within general surgery. BC management requires multidisciplinary competencies, with specialized training and dedicated care shown to improve patient outcomes. Breast surgery training should become a critical priority within residency programs. We conducted a cross-sectional survey during the 2025 Italian Society of Breast Surgeon (ANISC) annual meeting, to explore the opinions of breast surgery consultants and residentsregarding the current state of breast surgery training, as well as future perspectives for its improvement. A total of 126 participants (77% consultants, 23% residents) completed the survey. Most of the participants (49.2%) worked in medium-volume Breast Units and had > 10 years of clinical practice (45.2%). Overall, 67.5% of respondents judged their training only partially satisfactory, while 23.8% were completely dissatisfied. The majority (58.7%) supported a hybrid model with three years of general surgery followed by two years exclusively dedicated to breast surgery. Most respondents endorsed mandatory training periods in complementary specialties (79.4%) and rotations in peripheral Breast Units (69.8%). Notably, 88.1% favored the development of a vertical breast surgeon profile, capable of independently managing both oncologic and reconstructive procedures. This is the first national survey exploring breast care professionals’ perspectives on surgical training in Italy. Only 8.7% considered the current system adequate to meet clinical needs. The strong demand for structured and specialized programs, together with the recognition of a vertical breast surgeon figure, highlights the urgent need to redefine breast surgery training pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41886190What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.