Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41886180›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026

X2BR: High-fidelity 3D bone reconstruction from a planar X-ray image with hybrid neural implicit methods.

Gokce Guven, Fatih Ugurdag, Hasan F Ates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gokce GuvenDept. of Computer Science, Ozyegin University, Istanbul, 34794, Türkiye. gokce.guven@ozu.edu.tr.
Fatih UgurdagDept. of Electrical & Eletronics Eng., Ozyegin University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Hasan F AtesDept. of Artificial Intel. & Data Eng., Ozyegin University, Istanbul, Türkiye. hasan.ates@ozyegin.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6842-1528

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate 3D bone reconstructions are critical for surgical planning, implant design, and tracking musculoskeletal disorders. 3D bone reconstruction from a single planar X-ray remains challenging due to anatomical complexity and limited input. We propose X2BR, a hybrid neural implicit framework combining continuous volumetric reconstruction (X2B) with template-guided non-rigid registration (R). X2B employs a ConvNeXt-based encoder to extract spatial features from X-rays and predict high-fidelity 3D bone occupancy fields without relying on statistical shape models. To refine anatomical accuracy, X2BR integrates a patient-specific template mesh, constructed using YOLOv9-based detection and the SKEL biomechanical skeleton model. The coarse reconstruction is aligned to the template using geodesic-based coherent point drift, enabling anatomically consistent 3D bone volumes. Experimental results show that X2B achieves the highest numerical accuracy, with an IoU of 0.952 and Chamfer-L1 distance of 0.005, outperforming recent baselines including X2V and D2IM-Net. Building on this, X2BR incorporates anatomical priors via YOLOv9-based detection and biomechanical template alignment, leading to reconstructions that offer superior anatomical realism, especially in rib curvature and vertebral alignment, while slightly lower in IoU (0.875). This accuracy vs. visual consistency trade-off between X2B and X2BR highlights the value of hybrid frameworks for clinically relevant 3D reconstructions.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesImaging, Three-DimensionalNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumansBone reconstructionConvNeXtImplicit networksNon-rigid registrationX-ray

Identifiers

PMID41886180
PMCPMC13133211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.