Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41886174›Full record

ReviewAnnals of nuclear medicine2026

SPECT and PET imaging of Alzheimer's disease revisited: from biomarkers to artificial intelligence-based prediction.

Ioannis Tsougos, Varvara Valotassiou, Dimitra Tsivaka, Maria Satra, George Angelidis, John Papatriantafyllou, Emmanouil Panagiotidis, Efthimios Dardiotis, George Hadjigeorgiou, Panagiotis Georgoulias

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ioannis TsougosMedical Physics Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Panepistimiou 3, Biopolis, 41500, Larisa, Greece. tsougos@uth.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5204-5273
Varvara ValotassiouDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
Dimitra TsivakaMedical Physics Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Panepistimiou 3, Biopolis, 41500, Larisa, Greece.
Maria SatraFaculty of Public and One Health, University of Thessaly, Karditsa, Greece.
George AngelidisDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
John PapatriantafyllouIASIS Community Medical Center for the Elderly, Athens, Greece.
Emmanouil PanagiotidisDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
Efthimios DardiotisDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
George HadjigeorgiouMedical School, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Panagiotis GeorgouliasDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Alzheimer’s disease (AD), PET and SPECT enable in-vivo imaging of β-amyloid, tau, cerebral metabolism, and neuroinflammation. However, classical interpretation, including visual reads, ROI summaries, and SUVR thresholds, remains limited by reader variability, dependence on reference regions, and cross-site heterogeneity. Building upon our previous review on SPECT and PET imaging in AD, this article revisits molecular neuroimaging through the lens of artificial intelligence (AI), integrating advances from radiomics and classical machine learning to deep learning that support more quantitative and predictive use of PET/SPECT. Methods are organized by clinical objective, including diagnostic and differential classification, segmentation for region-wise measurement, automated quantification, image enhancement and reconstruction (attenuation correction, denoising, super-resolution, low-dose/short-scan recovery), and prognostic modeling (conversion and cognitive decline). We summarize key data resources, benchmarking, and standardization /harmonization strategies that improve generalization across scanners and tracers. Finally, we outline practical requirements for translation: models should provide well-calibrated probabilities, indicate when predictions are uncertain, offer outputs consistent with AD-relevant biology, report performance across relevant subgroups, and follow transparent reporting standards with clinically usable outputs, supporting earlier detection and more consistent monitoring in AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseArtificial IntelligencePositron-Emission TomographyTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonBiomarkersHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPrediction AlgorithmsBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseaseArtificial IntelligencePositron Emission TomographySingle-Photon Emission Computed Tomography

Identifiers

PMID41886174
PMCPMC13124770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.