ReviewAnnals of nuclear medicine2026
SPECT and PET imaging of Alzheimer's disease revisited: from biomarkers to artificial intelligence-based prediction.
Review in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Alzheimer’s disease (AD), PET and SPECT enable in-vivo imaging of β-amyloid, tau, cerebral metabolism, and neuroinflammation. However, classical interpretation, including visual reads, ROI summaries, and SUVR thresholds, remains limited by reader variability, dependence on reference regions, and cross-site heterogeneity. Building upon our previous review on SPECT and PET imaging in AD, this article revisits molecular neuroimaging through the lens of artificial intelligence (AI), integrating advances from radiomics and classical machine learning to deep learning that support more quantitative and predictive use of PET/SPECT. Methods are organized by clinical objective, including diagnostic and differential classification, segmentation for region-wise measurement, automated quantification, image enhancement and reconstruction (attenuation correction, denoising, super-resolution, low-dose/short-scan recovery), and prognostic modeling (conversion and cognitive decline). We summarize key data resources, benchmarking, and standardization /harmonization strategies that improve generalization across scanners and tracers. Finally, we outline practical requirements for translation: models should provide well-calibrated probabilities, indicate when predictions are uncertain, offer outputs consistent with AD-relevant biology, report performance across relevant subgroups, and follow transparent reporting standards with clinically usable outputs, supporting earlier detection and more consistent monitoring in AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.