ReviewCurrent oncology reports2026
De-Escalation Strategies in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe severe long-term toxicities of standard therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma underscore the need for treatment de-escalation. This review summarizes the rationale and evolving approaches to reduce treatment intensity while maintaining efficacy, with the goal of balancing survival outcomes and quality of life. RECENT
findingsDe-escalation strategies primarily focus on two domains: (1) radiotherapy optimization through target volume reduction, response-adapted dose de-escalation, and advanced techniques for organ preservation; (2) systemic therapy adjustments, including omitting concurrent chemotherapy in low-risk patients and exploring alternative or reduced-intensity cisplatin regimens. Emerging evidence suggests these approaches can significantly lessen toxicities such as hearing loss and xerostomia without compromising survival. De-escalation represents a promising paradigm for personalizing treatment in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, its implementation is hindered by the absence of standardized patient selection criteria. Future research should prioritize prospective multicenter trials to establish validated protocols and achieve personalized, less toxic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41886147What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.