Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41886147›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2026

De-Escalation Strategies in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Yulu Shen, Binhao Wu, Rong Zhang, Caineng Cao

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yulu ShenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Key Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No 1, East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, China.
Binhao WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Key Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No 1, East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, China.
Rong ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Key Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No 1, East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, China.
Caineng CaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Key Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No 1, East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, China. caocn@zjcc.org.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe severe long-term toxicities of standard therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma underscore the need for treatment de-escalation. This review summarizes the rationale and evolving approaches to reduce treatment intensity while maintaining efficacy, with the goal of balancing survival outcomes and quality of life. RECENT

findingsDe-escalation strategies primarily focus on two domains: (1) radiotherapy optimization through target volume reduction, response-adapted dose de-escalation, and advanced techniques for organ preservation; (2) systemic therapy adjustments, including omitting concurrent chemotherapy in low-risk patients and exploring alternative or reduced-intensity cisplatin regimens. Emerging evidence suggests these approaches can significantly lessen toxicities such as hearing loss and xerostomia without compromising survival. De-escalation represents a promising paradigm for personalizing treatment in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, its implementation is hindered by the absence of standardized patient selection criteria. Future research should prioritize prospective multicenter trials to establish validated protocols and achieve personalized, less toxic therapy.

Indexed as

Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyHumansQuality of LifeChemotherapy strategiesDe-escalation strategiesImmunotherapyNasopharyngeal carcinomaRadiotherapy optimization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.