Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41886142›Full record

Trial reportScience and engineering ethics2026

Effects of a Novel Responsible Conduct of Research Training Program and Learning Transfer Intervention on Ethical and Professional Decision-Making Skills.

Tristan McIntosh, Erin D Solomon, Mihi Dormeville, James M DuBois, Alison L Antes

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Science and engineering ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tristan McIntoshBioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. t.mcintosh@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1931-4793
Erin D SolomonBioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3295-0698
Mihi DormevilleBioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6979-590X
James M DuBoisBioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3712-7051
Alison L AntesBioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2632-7701

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
National Science Foundation 2024345NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NIH HHS UL1TR002345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the long-term effectiveness of responsible conduct of research (RCR) training and factors that support transfer of this learning to real-world settings after formal training concludes. We conducted a three-part study to explore short- and long-term effects of a culturally inclusive RCR training and a novel learning transfer intervention on professional decision-making skills. Biology and biomedical doctoral students across three cohorts participated in an RCR course focused on developing professional decision-making skills. In Study 1, students from Cohort 1 (N = 109) received the baseline control training, and students from Cohorts 2 and 3 (N = 195) received a revised culturally inclusive training. In Study 2, students from Cohorts 2 and 3 were randomly assigned to either a control group or a group receiving a monthly learning transfer intervention for 5 months after RCR training. The learning transfer intervention included identifying recent professional challenges, actions taken in response to challenges, and intentions to use professional decision-making strategies in the future. Study 3 involved follow-up interviews (N = 11) about experiences with the learning transfer intervention. Participants who received the revised training scored higher on professional decision-making compared to the baseline training. The learning transfer intervention did not improve self-reported use of professional decision-making skills. However, participants with low pre-course scores on professional decision-making saw sustained gains in these skills 6 months after the RCR training. Most participants interviewed about the learning transfer intervention perceived it as beneficial for being more reflective and intentional about using professional decision-making strategies.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEthics, ResearchLearningAdultCognitive ReflectionFemaleHumansMaleStudentsYoung AdultImplementation intentionsLearning transferProfessional decision-makingResponsible conduct of research trainingSMART strategies

Identifiers

PMID41886142
PMCPMC13269147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.