ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026
Dietary intervention among young cancer survivors within the CARE for CAYA program.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Nutritional Prevention of Oxidative Stress-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Pediatric Cardio-Oncology: Molecular Mechanisms and Translational Perspectives-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeA healthy diet and weight can reduce the risk of secondary diseases in child, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) cancer survivors.
methodsThe nutrition module of the CARE for CAYA program, a multimodal survivorship program, implemented needs-based dietary interventions for CAYAs (aged 15-39 years) at 14 German university clinics between December 2017 and July 2020 (RCT: January 2018 to July 2019). Individual needs were determined at baseline (T1), and those with high need for dietary intervention received intensified intervention (intervention group (IG)), while the control group (CG) received one basic counseling. Dietary quality was measured after 52 weeks (T3) using the HEI-EPIC. Changes in Mediterranean dietary adherence (MEDAS-FFQ), phase angle, BMI, nutrition-related barriers, fatigue, and quality of life, as well as subjective and objective taste perception were assessed.
resultsOverall, 74.4% (n = 267; 134 IG; 133 CG) had a high need for dietary intervention. Median age was 24.8 (interquartile range 19.6-31.6) and 66.7% were female. The dietary quality improved in IG (T1 = 50.0 pts; T3 = 58.0 pts) and in CG (T1 = 49.0 pts; T3 = 57.5 pts, intergroup difference p = 0.773). The Mediterranean dietary adherence improved significantly (IG) (p = 0.040). Both groups had improvements in fatigue and quality of life, empowerment for lifestyle changes, and high satisfaction with the intervention.
conclusionThe dietary intervention within a multimodal program had a positive impact on dietary quality and mental health in CAYAs. Implications for Cancer Survivors These findings may guide the development of future (dietary) programs in the follow-up care of CAYA cancer survivors.
trial registrationThe trial was registered with the German Clinical Trial Register on 19 January 2018 (DRKS00012504| http://www.germanctr.de/ ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41886140What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.