ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2026
Comparison of the modeling effects between two hemorrhoid models.
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study compared the modeling effects of a rat internal hemorrhoid model with the croton oil-induced acute hemorrhoid model of rat.
methodsA total of 48 SPF-grade SD rats were randomly divided into a control group and model group, with 24 rats in each. The model group used croton oil mixture to induce and combined with both standing posture and swimming movement to establish the model, with a modeling time of 1 week; the control group used croton oil mixture for induction. Observations were made on the symptoms and signs at 6 h and 1, 3, and 7 days post-modeling. Anorectal coefficient measurement, histopathological analysis, laser speckle contrast imaging, reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), immunohistochemical (IHC), and western blotting were used to evaluate the outcomes of different modeling methods.
resultsIn contrast to the control group, the model group exhibited a more obvious degree of organ swelling, accompanied by a greater degree of rectal prolapse and an increase in the anorectal coefficient. Under microscopic examination, the model group demonstrated severe epidermal cell death and significant blood vessel congestion. Laser speckle contrast imaging revealed that the model group exhibited increased rectal blood perfusion with enlarged capillaries. The model group showed higher relative mRNA levels of interleukin (IL)-2, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) at all time points, along with elevated protein levels of these cytokines.
conclusionThe rat internal hemorrhoid model demonstrated modeling effects more aligned with clinical features of internal hemorrhoids. The model is a better option for research purposes in the development of treatments for hemorrhoids compared to the croton oil-induced acute hemorrhoid model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.