Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41886066›Full record

ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Treatment possibilities for bony defects in posterior shoulder instability].

Felix Dyrna

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Felix DyrnaGelenkzentrum-Leipzig, Richard Lehmann-Str. 21, 04275, Leipzig, Deutschland. felix.dyrna@gelenkzentrum-leipzig.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn contrast to anterior instability, posterior instability accounts for only a small proportion of shoulder instability cases; however, chronic or recurrent posterior instability is frequently accompanied by bone loss on the glenoid and humeral side, which plays a critical role in persistent instability and failure of isolated soft-tissue repair. Even moderate osseous defects can significantly compromise glenohumeral biomechanics and joint stability. PATHOLOGY: Posterior glenoid bone loss leads to a reduction of the concavity-compression mechanism and loss of posterior containment, whereas humeral impression defects in the form of a reverse Hill-Sachs lesion may result in engagement at the posterior glenoid rim. Consequently, surgical strategies addressing osseous deficiencies have gained increasing importance, particularly in cases of chronic instability, substantial bone loss, or failed previous stabilization procedures. SURGICAL TECHNIQUES: Several bone augmentation techniques have been described to restore posterior glenoid stability. Among these, the Eden-Hybinette procedure and the Kouvalchouk procedure represent established surgical options, each based on different biomechanical concepts. While the Eden-Hybinette technique aims to reconstruct the posterior glenoid rim using a free bone graft, the Kouvalchouk procedure provides functional stabilization through combination of a local posterior bone block and adherent soft tissue augmentation. On the humeral side, anatomical reconstruction of engaging reverse Hill-Sachs lesions using an autologous iliac crest bone graft has been shown to restore humeral head sphericity and prevent recurrent engagement.

aimDespite increasing clinical use, considerable heterogeneity remains regarding indications, surgical techniques, and reported outcomes of osseous reconstruction procedures for posterior shoulder instability. The aim of this article is to review current surgical treatment options for glenoid and humeral bone defects in posterior shoulder instability, with a particular emphasis on technical aspects, advantages, and limitations of posterior bone block procedures, as well as humeral reconstruction of reverse Hill-Sachs lesions. By critically discussing biomechanical principles, surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes, this review seeks to provide a practical framework for decision-making in the management of this complex pathology.

Indexed as

Bone TransplantationJoint InstabilityPlastic Surgery ProceduresShoulder DislocationShoulder JointArthroscopyGlenoid CavityHumansTreatment OutcomeBankart lesionsGlenohumeral jointHill-Sachs lesionHypermobility, jointPosteriore shoulderinstability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.