Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41886039›Full record

ReviewDiscover oncology2026

Multimodal radiomics for precision management of colorectal cancer.

Ying Wei, Junqin Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ying WeiDepartment of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Linping District, Hangzhou, 311100, Zhejiang, China.
Junqin ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Linping District, Hangzhou, 311100, Zhejiang, China. sparkle120@163.com.

Funding

Zhejiang Provincial Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan Project 2024XY023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment continues to face substantial challenges, including persistent recurrence risk, the development of drug resistance, and marked interpatient variability in therapeutic response. Multimodal radiomics (MMR), through the integrated analysis of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), and molecular data, enables multidimensional characterization of tumor morphology and underlying biology, thereby providing an expanded basis for precision-oriented decision-making. This review synthesizes recent progress in the clinical application of MMR across key domains, including preoperative staging, prediction of treatment response, surveillance for recurrence, and assessment of efficacy for immunotherapy and targeted therapies, with particular attention to how multimodal integration may improve characterization of metastatic heterogeneity and support individualized treatment planning. We further delineate the principal barriers to clinical translation, notably the lack of robust standardization across acquisition and segmentation workflows, limited model generalizability due to heterogeneity in datasets and validation strategies, and unresolved issues in ethical governance and data stewardship. Looking forward, the integration of radiomics with genomics, clinical records, and artificial intelligence (AI) holds promise for building patient-specific digital twin systems, supporting CRC management with more data-driven, individualized decision support, provided that harmonization, external validation, and prospective evaluation are addressed.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceColorectal cancerDigital twinMultimodal radiomicsPersonalized therapyPrecision medicineRadiomicsTumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID41886039
PMCPMC13139516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.