ReviewDiscover oncology2026
Multimodal radiomics for precision management of colorectal cancer.
Review in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment continues to face substantial challenges, including persistent recurrence risk, the development of drug resistance, and marked interpatient variability in therapeutic response. Multimodal radiomics (MMR), through the integrated analysis of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), and molecular data, enables multidimensional characterization of tumor morphology and underlying biology, thereby providing an expanded basis for precision-oriented decision-making. This review synthesizes recent progress in the clinical application of MMR across key domains, including preoperative staging, prediction of treatment response, surveillance for recurrence, and assessment of efficacy for immunotherapy and targeted therapies, with particular attention to how multimodal integration may improve characterization of metastatic heterogeneity and support individualized treatment planning. We further delineate the principal barriers to clinical translation, notably the lack of robust standardization across acquisition and segmentation workflows, limited model generalizability due to heterogeneity in datasets and validation strategies, and unresolved issues in ethical governance and data stewardship. Looking forward, the integration of radiomics with genomics, clinical records, and artificial intelligence (AI) holds promise for building patient-specific digital twin systems, supporting CRC management with more data-driven, individualized decision support, provided that harmonization, external validation, and prospective evaluation are addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.