ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Prognostic Value of Combined Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 and Duke Pancreatic Monoclonal Antigen Type 2 Assessment in Biliary Tract Cancer.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCarbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) represents an established prognostic biomarker for biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Clinical utility remains limited among patients with Lewis antigen negativity or incomplete fucosyltransferase 3 (FUT3) gene function, conditions associated with absent or reduced CA19-9 production. Duke pancreatic monoclonal antigen type 2 (DUPAN-2), a biosynthetic precursor of CA19-9, shows compensatory elevation under such conditions. This study evaluated the prognostic significance of the combined preoperative assessment of CA19-9 and DUPAN-2 among patients with resectable BTCs. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients who underwent curative-intent surgery for BTCs between 2009 and 2022 were included. Eligible patients were classified into four groups according to preoperative biomarker levels: normal CA19-9/normal DUPAN-2 (N/N), normal CA19-9/high DUPAN-2 (N/H), high CA19-9/normal DUPAN-2 (H/N), and high CA19-9/high DUPAN-2 (H/H). Clinicopathological features, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared. Multivariate analyses identified independent prognostic factors.
resultsThe cohort included 276 patients with BTCs who underwent curative resection, comprising 41 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, 72 hilar cholangiocarcinomas, 57 distal cholangiocarcinomas, 53 gallbladder carcinomas, and 53 ampullary carcinomas. Age and tumor distribution showed no significant intergroup differences. The N/N group demonstrated significantly superior OS and RFS (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified the N/N profile as an independent favorable prognostic factor for OS and RFS (P < 0.001).
conclusionsConcurrent normal CA19-9 and DUPAN-2 levels independently predicted favorable outcomes. Combined preoperative biomarker assessment may contribute to prognostic stratification of BTCs, including among patients with Lewis antigen negativity or impaired FUT3 function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.