Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41886023›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2026

Assessment of lameness prevalence and associated individual and herd risk factors in small-scale Algerian dairy farms.

Kheyreddine Atia, Zoubida Dendani Chadi, Riad Bouzid, Djalel Eddine Gherissi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kheyreddine AtiaLaboratory of Agriculture and Ecosystem Functioning, Departement of Agronomy Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences, University of Chadli Bendjedid, El Tarf, 36000, Algeria.
Zoubida Dendani ChadiLaboratory of Biodiversity and Echosystems Pollution, Faculty of Life and Nature Sciences, University of Chadli Bendjedid, El Tarf, 36000, Algeria.
Riad BouzidLaboratory of Agriculture and Ecosystem Functioning, Departement of Agronomy Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences, University of Chadli Bendjedid, El Tarf, 36000, Algeria.
Djalel Eddine GherissiLaboratory of Animal Production, Biotechnology and Health (PABIOS), Institute of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, University of Souk Ahras, Souk Ahras, 41000, Algeria. d.gherissi@univ-soukahras.dz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1615-1658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2021 to May 2022 on 19 small-scale dairy farms across two agro-ecological zones in northeastern Algeria to estimate the prevalence of lameness in dairy cows and identify associated risk factors. A total of 556 lactating cows were visually examined using a four-point gait scoring system (0–3), with scores ≥ 2 classified as clinically lame. Farm management practices, cow characteristics, and environmental conditions were recorded through interviews and direct observation. Associations between each potential risk factor and lameness were evaluated using univariable generalized linear mixed models (GLMM), incorporating farm as a random effect to account for clustering. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Lameness prevalence was 11% at the cow level, and 57.8% of farms had at least one lame animal. Significant factors associated with lameness included parity (p = 0.048), breed (p = 0.001), flooring system (p = 0.013), grazing practice (p = 0.001), and hoof trimming frequency (p = 0.013). First-parity cows had lower odds of lameness than cows in later parities (OR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.10–0.78). Holstein cows were at substantially higher risk compared with the Brown Atlas (OR = 9.08; 95% CI: 2.73–30.24). Earth flooring appeared protective (OR = 0.14; 95% CI: 0.02–0.99), whereas spring-restricted grazing (OR = 4.04) and zero-grazing systems (OR = 12.80) increased lameness likelihood. Infrequent hoof trimming, either once annually or irregular, was associated with markedly higher odds of lameness. No significant associations were observed for age, region, herd size, housing type, or footbath use (p > 0.05). Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) followed by Hierarchical Ascending Clustering (HAC) identified three distinct herd typologies (all p < 0.001). Cluster 1 (traditional systems) grouped farms with earth flooring, year-round grazing, local breeds, and absence of trimming; this cluster showed the lowest proportion of lame cows, consistent with its protective characteristics. Cluster 2 (transitional systems) combined concrete flooring, tie-stalls, mixed breeds, and occasional trimming and showed an intermediate lameness frequency. Cluster 3 (modernized systems), characterized by Prim’Holstein predominance, sand flooring, restricted spring grazing, and systematic footbath use, showed the highest lameness occurrence, aligning with the high-risk factors identified in the GLMM. These findings highlight how structural and management practices co-occur within production systems and shape the distribution of lameness across dairy farms.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesDairyingLameness, AnimalAlgeriaAnimal HusbandryAnimalsCattleCross-Sectional StudiesFemalePrevalenceRisk FactorsAlgeriaCowsLameness prevalenceLocomotion scoring systemsRisk factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.