ReviewArchives of microbiology2026
CRISPR-anti-CRISPR dynamics: evolutionary, ecological and biotechnological perspectives.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Synergistic strategies to rescue the last-resort antibiotic colistin.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phages and bacteria are engaged in an evolutionary arms race. CRISPR-Cas systems allow bacteria to resist phage predation, contributing to competitive advantages for certain bacterial strains. However, phages generate a diverse anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins to effectively neutralise the CRISPR-Cas system. Acr proteins restore phage infectivity, which may contribute in limiting the dominance of CRISPR-armed bacterial strains, potentially influencing the microbial diversity in certain environments. Acrs can influence microbial community dynamics which may indirectly affect ecosystem functions such as nutrient cycling in certain marine and soil ecosystems. The potential of these Acrs proteins in controlled and reversible genome editing, highlights their potential as regulatory components for genome editing systems. This review discusses the molecular mechanism of CRISPR and anti-CRISPRs, highlights the diversity and limitations of known inhibitory mechanisms, ecological role of anti-CRISPRs and highlights their expanding application in microbial evolution and biotechnology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41885929What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.