ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Educating Students About Digital Health Research Ethics: Curricula Review and Expert Interview Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rapid growth of digital health research, involving wearable devices, mobile apps, and sociotechnical health systems, raises complex ethical, legal, and social considerations. While institutional review boards and research ethics frameworks address some concerns, less is known about how students and trainees in digital health are systematically educated to recognize and navigate these challenges. Understanding the scope and content of ethics training is critical to ensuring the responsible development and application of digital health technologies.
objectiveThis study investigated how college students are trained to identify and address ethical considerations in digital health research through an analysis of formal curricula and expert perspectives.
methodsResearchers reviewed 132 syllabi from 76 academic programs across 62 universities and conducted semistructured interviews with 6 leading digital health scholars. All syllabi were coded for instructional content and learning objectives. Researchers conducted open coding and collaboratively applied affinity diagramming to organize the data into hierarchical themes.
resultsAll syllabi included instructional content, and most included explicit learning objectives. Analysis identified 7 key themes, which captured both explicit knowledge imparted through formal instruction and tacit knowledge cultivated through laboratory work, mentorship, and applied experiences. Findings highlighted gaps between formal ethics instruction and the realities of research practice.
conclusionsEthics education in digital health research develops through the interplay of formal coursework and practice-based training, each fostering complementary skills needed for data-intensive and collaborative environments. Together, these pathways support students in identifying ethical issues, applying principles contextually, anticipating emerging risks, and communicating across disciplines; however, access to experiential learning opportunities remains inconsistent. Strengthening ethics training will require expanding structured early research engagement, cultivating communities of practice, and translating tacit ethical reasoning into accessible resources. Integrating ethical reflection into routine research activities may better prepare future digital health researchers to responsibly design and govern sociotechnical health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.