Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41885732›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2026

Intracranial electroencephalographic approaches in the intensive care unit: Safety, feasibility, and coverage.

Steven Smeijers, Mariella Segreti, Anaïs Van Hoylandt, Jeroen Gijs, Johannes van Loon, Lauranne Scheldeman, Bart Depreitere, Tom Theys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Steven SmeijersNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3548-1022
Mariella SegretiDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5409-7409
Anaïs Van HoylandtNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jeroen GijsNeurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9950-6874
Johannes van LoonNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4684-0051
Lauranne ScheldemanNeurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5263-3550
Bart DepreitereNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7458-0648
Tom TheysNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7595-3234

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 11K8923NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1830722NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G0B6422N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNonconvulsive epileptic activity is common after acute brain injury and contributes to neuronal injury and poor outcomes. Although intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) improves detection compared with surface EEG (suEEG), it currently relies on focal recordings of epileptic dynamics. We prospectively evaluated multielectrode iEEG strategies designed to achieve large-scale cortical and deep brain coverage in critically ill patients.

methodsIn a prospective cohort of adults with acute brain injury requiring invasive neuromonitoring, we implemented four depth electrode-based iEEG techniques: three electrocorticographic approaches (open subdural, burr hole subdural, and foramen ovale) and one stereotactic (transcortical) approach. The primary objective was to establish and quantify the extent and durability of cortical recordings. Additional assessments included safety, feasibility, and management impact. Electrode localization was performed in MNI305 space, and recording longevity was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models.

resultsThirty patients with severe brain injury underwent implantation of 64 electrodes (772 contacts), yielding 361 total iEEG recording days across heterogeneous etiologies and surgical settings. Multielectrode implantation enabled distributed sampling spanning multilobar frontoparietotemporal cortical clusters. Overall, 72% of electrodes sampled cortical convexity alone, whereas 28% incorporated deep targets, including mesial temporal and orbitofrontal regions. Recording durability differed by implantation strategy (log-rank p = .0002), with a mean combined iEEG-suEEG monitoring duration of 14.5 days per patient. Implantation was successful in >95% of electrodes, monitoring started within 24 h postoperatively in 88%, and the per-electrode risk of a causally related adverse event was 3.1%, without hemorrhagic complications. iEEG influenced treatment initiation or escalation in 32% of monitored patients. SIGNIFICANCE: Multielectrode iEEG strategies enable durable, large-scale cortical sampling in acute brain injury while remaining feasible and safe in the intensive care unit. By shifting from focal to distributed spatial sampling, these approaches provide a conceptual framework for improving detection of epileptic activity in critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesElectrocorticographyEpilepsyAdultAgedElectrodes, ImplantedElectroencephalographyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studiesdepth electroencephalographyelectrocorticographyintracranial electrodesneuromonitoringseizure

Identifiers

PMID41885732
PMCPMC13360996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.