ArticleLupus2026
Patient perspectives on SLE, refractory APS, and biologic drug use during pregnancy.
Article in Lupus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PurposeWomen with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and/or Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) have an increased risk of pregnancy complications. This study explored their perspectives on pregnancy, pregnancy complications, and medication use during pregnancy.MethodsIn collaboration with the Dutch National Patient Association for Lupus Erythematosus, an online questionnaire was developed and distributed among female members. The questionnaire presented eight potential pregnancy complication scenarios. Respondents indicated whether they found the standard medication regime sufficient and their willingness to take additional medication. They also assessed which side effects of biological therapies would discourage additional treatment. The survey ran from November 18, 2023, to March 19, 2024.Major findingsOf 71 respondents (mean age 39), 42% had APS, 31% had SLE, and 27% had both. A majority (79%) would endure pregnancy complications, such as SLE flare or pre-eclampsia, if it meant a live-born baby. Willingness to use additional medication varied by scenario (51%-89%) depending on the specific complication at risk. Most side effects associated with the use of biologicals were deemed acceptable by the majority of respondents. However, a slight majority indicated they would refrain from additional medication if it led to an increased risk of infections such as urinary tract infections or pneumonia.ConclusionMost women would accept adverse obstetric outcomes or maternal complications as long as pregnancy results in a live birth. The majority of respondents consistently expressed a desire for additional medication to reduce the risk of complications during pregnancy, regardless of the specific complication at hand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.