Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41885718›Full record

ArticleLupus2026

Patient perspectives on SLE, refractory APS, and biologic drug use during pregnancy.

Jara van Woerkom, Merlijn Wind, Yoe Kie Onno Teng, Titia Lely, Jamy Pullen, Gerard Jansen, Luis Perez-Garcia, Radboud Dolhain, Maarten Limper, Judith Kooiman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lupus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jara van WoerkomDepartment of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherland.
Merlijn WindDepartment of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Yoe Kie Onno TengDepartment of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Titia LelyDepartment of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherland.
Jamy PullenDutch National Patient Association for Lupus Erythematosus (NVLE), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gerard JansenDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Luis Perez-GarciaDepartment of Rheumatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Radboud DolhainDepartment of Rheumatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten LimperDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Judith KooimanDepartment of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherland.ORCID 0000-0002-0556-9234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PurposeWomen with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and/or Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) have an increased risk of pregnancy complications. This study explored their perspectives on pregnancy, pregnancy complications, and medication use during pregnancy.MethodsIn collaboration with the Dutch National Patient Association for Lupus Erythematosus, an online questionnaire was developed and distributed among female members. The questionnaire presented eight potential pregnancy complication scenarios. Respondents indicated whether they found the standard medication regime sufficient and their willingness to take additional medication. They also assessed which side effects of biological therapies would discourage additional treatment. The survey ran from November 18, 2023, to March 19, 2024.Major findingsOf 71 respondents (mean age 39), 42% had APS, 31% had SLE, and 27% had both. A majority (79%) would endure pregnancy complications, such as SLE flare or pre-eclampsia, if it meant a live-born baby. Willingness to use additional medication varied by scenario (51%-89%) depending on the specific complication at risk. Most side effects associated with the use of biologicals were deemed acceptable by the majority of respondents. However, a slight majority indicated they would refrain from additional medication if it led to an increased risk of infections such as urinary tract infections or pneumonia.ConclusionMost women would accept adverse obstetric outcomes or maternal complications as long as pregnancy results in a live birth. The majority of respondents consistently expressed a desire for additional medication to reduce the risk of complications during pregnancy, regardless of the specific complication at hand.

Indexed as

Antiphospholipid SyndromeBiological ProductsLupus Erythematosus, SystemicPregnancy ComplicationsAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNetherlandsPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesBiological Productsantiphospholipid syndromePregnancysystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID41885718
PMCPMC13129208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.