Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41885618›Full record

ArticleGenetics2026

Methods for joint genetic prediction of multiple ordinal categorical and continuous traits.

Matias Bermann, Andres Legarra, Ignacy Misztal, Daniela Lourenco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matias BermannDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5374-0710
Andres LegarraDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8893-7620
Ignacy MisztalDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0382-1897
Daniela LourencoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3140-1002

Funding

Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive 2024-67015-42255US Department of Agriculture's National Institute of Food and Agriculture
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The landscape of animal and plant breeding is rapidly evolving. Companies now invest millions in collecting extensive data on health, disease, welfare, and fertility, which are key fitness traits relevant for sustainable production. Likewise, genomic-based predictions or GWAS-based searches for causal variants in categorically scored psychiatric disorders and other diseases are key areas in clinical genetics. The categorical nature (yes/no, scores, etc.) of these traits violates the normality assumptions of standard linear models; threshold or threshold-linear models represent conceptually attractive alternatives. In Bayesian settings, these models can be fitted either via Gibbs sampling or by maximizing the posterior density (maximum a posteriori, MAP). While Gibbs sampling is flexible and can handle multivariate models with several categorical and continuous traits, its computational and memory demands limit its applicability in large-scale applications and genetic and genomic predictions. MAP methods are computationally efficient and suitable for large-scale datasets. However, existing MAP methods are restricted to a single categorical trait and many continuous ones, making them insufficient for the new generation of data. The lack of proper methods for fitting highly dimensional threshold-linear models for quantitative genetics has persisted for over 2 decades. Failing to model categorical traits appropriately can lead to reduced genetic gain and deterioration of the traits over time. This study develops theoretically sound and computationally efficient framework for jointly analyzing multiple categorical and Gaussian traits, specifically multi-trait threshold-linear models, including or not pedigree and genomic information. The proposed MAP multiple-trait threshold-linear model methods are based on Newton-Raphson and Expectation-Maximization schemes. Using a simulated dataset and treating Gibbs sampling as the benchmark, we found that the breeding values estimated by our methods agree nearly perfectly with those obtained from Gibbs sampling, while greatly reducing computational cost and allowing scalability to very large datasets. As expected, the Newton-Raphson iteration outperformed the Expectation-Maximization algorithm in terms of computational time. Our results demonstrate that routine genetic evaluations incorporating multiple categorical traits are now feasible using the presented methodology. Solving this decades-old gap enables accurate, large-scale genetic and genomic predictions of key categorical fitness traits under multi-trait models, unlocking the full potential of genomic selection for complex traits in animal and plant populations and genomic-based predictions in clinical genetics.

Indexed as

GenomicsModels, GeneticQuantitative Trait, HeritableQuantitative Trait LociAnimalsBayes TheoremGenome-Wide Association StudyPhenotypebinary traitsexpectation-maximizationliabilityNewton-Raphsonsingle-step GBLUPthreshold models

Identifiers

PMID41885618
PMCPMC13147522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.