ArticleGenetics2026
Evolution of the rate, molecular spectrum, and fitness effects of mutation under minimal selection in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Controlling for life-history traits in vertebrates reveals that effective population size does not affect mutation rate or genome size.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rate, molecular spectrum, and fitness effects of mutations vary at all levels of the biological hierarchy, from within individual genomes to among taxonomic domains. Understanding the evolutionary factors underpinning that variation is of fundamental importance to biology. Accurate quantification of the properties of mutations requires that other evolutionary forces, especially natural selection, be minimized as much as possible. To investigate the evolution of the mutational process in Caenorhabditis elegans, we propagated a set of 100 "first order" mutation accumulation (O1MA) lines under minimal selection for ∼150 generations, divided each O1MA line into 2 "second order" MA (O2MA) lines and propagated them for another ∼150 generations, at which time the genome of each O2MA line was sequenced, and a subset of 50 O1MA families was assayed for competitive fitness. Over the course of the experiment, the mean nucleotide substitution mutation rate did not change, but the variance increased. In contrast, the indel mutation rate increased significantly. The 2 types of mutations fulfill the predictions of different theoretical models for the evolution of mutation rate. These results reinforce previous findings that the rate of indels is more sensitive to endogenous stress than the rate of nucleotide substitutions. Several evolutionary quandaries could be resolved if deleterious mutations interact synergistically (negative epistasis). Evidence for synergistic epistasis is famously inconclusive, although there is reason to think it may be more detectable under competitive conditions. However, a model of constant mutational effects on competitive fitness explains the results significantly better than a model including epistasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.