ReviewJournal of immunology research2026
From Demyelination to Intervention: Natural Compounds as Emerging Therapeutic Targets in Multiple Sclerosis Neuroinflammation.
Review in Journal of immunology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Demyelination to Intervention: Natural Compounds as Emerging Therapeutic Targets in Multiple Sclerosis Neuroinflammation.Journal of immunology research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS), characterized by multifocal lesions, axonal damage, and progressive neurological dysfunction, imposing a heavy burden on patients and healthcare systems. While T lymphocytes have long been regarded as central to MS pathogenesis, accumulating evidence underscores the pivotal role of B lymphocytes and dysregulated cytokine networks (e.g., Th17/IL-17 and NF-κB pathways) in driving disease initiation and progression. Despite advances in symptomatic management and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), clinical interventions for MS remain constrained by severe side effects, drug dependency, and suboptimal long-term efficacy, highlighting an urgent unmet need for novel therapeutic strategies. Natural compounds (e.g., alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and polyphenols) have emerged as promising candidates owing to their inherent biocompatibility, favorable safety profiles, and multi-targeted regulatory effects on neuroinflammation. This review critically synthesizes and evaluates current evidence on the therapeutic potential of natural compounds in MS, with a focus on cross-compound class integration of core common pathways (e.g., NF-κB inhibition and Th17/Treg balance modulation) rather than isolated mechanism descriptions. We explicitly compare the strength of evidence across different natural compounds, clarifying which findings are well-substantiated versus preliminary. Notably, we emphasize the inherent limitations of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) models in recapitulating human MS pathophysiology (e.g., interspecies immune divergence and disease heterogeneity) and integrate or at least reference relevant clinical/epidemiological evidence to enhance translational relevance. Finally, we outline key future perspectives, including the integration of natural products with existing DMTs, challenges in clinical trial design, and prospects of combination therapies, aiming to provide a directional framework for advancing natural compounds from preclinical exploration to actionable clinical therapeutic targets in MS and enhancing the translational impact of this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.