ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
Revisiting the Meaning of 'Value' in Value-Based Healthcare: A Concept Analysis.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHealthcare systems are undergoing major transformation driven by technological progress, growing patient involvement, workforce shortages, complex care needs, and rising costs. Against this backdrop, value-based healthcare has gained traction, yet the notion of 'value' remains ambiguously defined.
aimTo clarify the concept of 'value' in value-based healthcare.
designWe conducted a concept analysis using Walker & Avant's eight-step method: (1) Select a concept; (2) Determine the aims; (3) Identify uses; (4) Define the concept's attributes; (5) Identify the model case(s); (6) Identify additional cases; (7) Identify antecedents and consequences; and (8) Define empirical referents. DATA SOURCES: Scoping review methods following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) recommendations were used to introduce rigour in locating, screening, and extracting data. We used a deductive thematic analysis for data analysis.
resultsWe selected the concept of value in value-based healthcare because it lacked conceptual clarity to support healthcare systems transformations. We propose that value arises when outcomes-to-costs ratios (empirical referents) are considered in processes (uses) addressing healthcare systems transformations, characterised by more informed and engaged patients and rising costs (antecedents). Model case included consideration for all components (health, non-health outcomes, and direct, indirect, social costs) of the ratio, whereas additional cases showed that consideration for most, not all, or none of these components led to partial or no value creation. Value is used from individual to collective dimensions and at clinical, organisational and system levels (attributes) to improve patient experience, care team well-being, health equity, and population health, and to reduce costs (consequences).
conclusionA shared understanding of 'value' can guide its design, measurement, and implementation to support successful transformations toward value-based healthcare. IMPLICATIONS: Our conceptual proposition of 'value' within value-based healthcare establishes a framework for a common understanding of 'value' that enables the successful transformation of health systems toward value-based healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.