ArticleAustralian veterinary journal2026
No news may not be good news: A qualitative exploration of employee voice and leader responsiveness in Australian veterinary clinics.
Article in Australian veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- It takes a village - a collective approach to a thriving veterinary profession.Australian veterinary journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetaining staff in veterinary clinics is an ongoing challenge, with workforce shortages threatening clinic functioning. The constructs of employee voice and leader responsiveness are reported as critical to employee retention, but their role in veterinary clinics is under-researched. This study explores the influences, processes and outcomes of the employee voice and leader responsiveness interaction in Australian veterinary clinics to better understand how these interactions may support staff retention and inform practical strategies for clinics.
methodsFollowing purposive sampling, 24 semistructured interviews were conducted with current employees, leaders and owners of Australian general practice veterinary clinics to capture a range of relevant lived experiences. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis was used to ensure a focus on foregrounding participants' voices during data exploration, providing sufficient depth within and breadth across groups.
resultsLeaders' approaches to employee voice evolved over time, shaped by values and skills. Heavy workloads and constant pressure limited their capacity to respond effectively. Employees weighed perceived safety, ease and effectiveness before speaking up. Silence fed discontentment and low morale. When employees voiced, leader responses had a profound impact on how employees felt: 'my back is covered' and 'grateful' or 'disrespected', 'dismissed', 'bitter' and 'unappreciated'.
conclusionEarly proactive voice met with constructive leader responses can address concerns and promote loyalty and enthusiasm, highlighting its potential to encourage 'enthusiastic staying' in veterinary clinics. Organisations should ensure employees can safely and easily speak up and equip leaders with the skills and capacity to effectively respond. Further research should examine contextual conditions enabling these interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.