Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41885401›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2026

Progressive Versus Conservative Chest Tube Management Following Surgery for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax.

Quirine C A van Steenwijk, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Wolter Oosterhuis, Denis Susa, Matthijs D M Bolmers, Robert T J Kortekaas, Chris Dickhoff, Jerry Braun, Frank J C van den Broek

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Quirine C A van SteenwijkDepartment of Surgery, Maxima Medical Center, 5504 DB Veldhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6749-4779
Marcel G W DijkgraafDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0750-8790
Wolter OosterhuisDepartment of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0003-4887-6415
Denis SusaDepartment of Surgery, Bravis Hospital, 4624 VT Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands.
Matthijs D M BolmersDepartment of Surgery, Dijklander Hospital, 1624 NP Hoorn, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9190-3576
Robert T J KortekaasDepartment of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis, 3045 PM Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0111-5390
Chris DickhoffDepartment of Cardiothoracic surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6396-8372
Jerry BraunDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4504-6235
Frank J C van den BroekDepartment of Surgery, Maxima Medical Center, 5504 DB Veldhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4828-5725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives"Enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery" is increasingly implemented following surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). Historically, postoperative chest tubes are left in place for several days to ensure adequate pleurodesis and prevent recurrence. Prompt chest tube removal upon cessation of air leakage may enhance recovery but potentially increases risk of recurrence. We evaluated progressive chest tube management following surgical pleurodesis for PSP.

methodsRetrospective multicentre study of patients undergoing surgical pleurodesis for PSP between 2020 and 2023. Hospitals with implemented progressive chest tube management (removal upon cessation of air leakage <8 hours) were compared against hospitals with conservative management (removal after 1-2 days). Outcome measures, corrected for bias using directed acyclic graphs, were postoperative length of stay (LOS), chest tube duration, complications, and ipsilateral recurrences.

resultsA total of 183 patients from 5 hospitals were included: 99 patients in the progressive and 84 in the conservative group. Follow-up and baseline characteristics were comparable, except for surgical indication, pleurodesis technique, and use of postoperative chest X-ray. Progressive management significantly reduced LOS (Δ1 day), chest tube duration (Δ2 days), and complications (9.1 vs 21.4%). After correction for pleurodesis technique, persistent air leakage, and chest X-ray, LOS was reduced by 1.03 day (P < .001). Recurrences (6.6%) were similar across groups (P = .388).

conclusionsProgressive chest tube management reduces LOS, chest tube duration, and complications without increasing the risk of recurrence in this retrospective comparative study. A prospective study is necessary to validate these findings before considering widespread implementation.

Indexed as

Chest TubesConservative TreatmentPleurodesisPneumothoraxPostoperative CareAdultFemaleHumansLength of StayMalePostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesThoracic Surgery, Video-Assistedchest tube managementprimary spontaneous pneumothoraxVATS

Identifiers

PMID41885401
PMCPMC13106895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.