ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2026
Barriers to the Implementation of Local Anesthesia for Older Adults Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUse of local anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair in older adults is recommended by society guidelines because of reduced postoperative cognitive dysfunction and improved functional recovery after surgery compared to general anesthesia. However, in practice, few inguinal hernia repairs in older adults are actually done under local anesthesia. PARTICIPANTS AND
settingKey stakeholders involved in inguinal hernia repair at Veterans' Affairs hospital systems including patients, surgeons, anesthesiologists, and hospital leaders.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups to identify barriers and facilitators to use of local anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair in older adults. Qualitative data were analyzed using Direct Content Analysis guided by the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation (COM-B) framework.
resultsWe interviewed 40 Veterans aged ≥ 65 years who had undergone inguinal hernia repair at 3 hospitals, and we convened focus groups and interviews with 10 surgeons, 9 anesthesiologists, and 7 hospital leaders. We found patients were not consistently offered the opportunity to have shared decision-making conversations about the advantages and disadvantages of local versus general anesthesia because standard pre-operative care workflows did not allow for conversations incorporating perspectives of all stakeholders, especially anesthesiologists. Also, it was difficult to disentangle choice of anesthesia modality from choice of surgical approach. There were entrenched opinions among many surgeons about perceived advantages of minimally invasive surgery, which requires general anesthesia, without regard for the cognitive and recovery benefits of open surgery using local anesthesia. Finally, providers and hospital leaders highlighted how improved protocols for local anesthesia administration, increased buy-in from hospital leadership, and more high-quality evidence in support of local anesthesia were all necessary to increase its use.
conclusionsThe findings serve as a roadmap for a multi-component plan to increase use of local anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair in older adults, with clear advantages for post-operative cognitive and functional recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.