Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41885302›Full record

ArticleClinical rehabilitation2026

Factors influencing clinical decision-making in inpatient rehabilitation: A scoping review.

Caitlin G Dobson, Holly Carrington, Gloria M Hernandez, Hannah C Go, Sophia N Hameed, Alison M Cogan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caitlin G DobsonChan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0606-7842
Holly CarringtonChan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-1510-7888
Gloria M HernandezChan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Hannah C GoChan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sophia N HameedLeonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alison M CoganChan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6800-1988

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveTo synthesize research about clinical reasoning and decision-making among therapists in inpatient rehabilitation facilities about how they organize care and use their treatment time.Data sourcesPubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched for relevant empirical studies published prior to January 13, 2026.Review methodsScoping review. The review process was organized using Covidence. Included studies featured descriptions of clinical decisions explained by occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech therapists in inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Two reviewers coded the extracted themes through inductive analysis using Dedoose.ResultsOf 1239 articles identified through the search process, 51 met inclusion criteria. We identified six factors across studies that contributed to therapists' clinical decision-making including: (1) consideration of non-medical circumstances (with sub-themes of understanding the patient's perspective, presence of families and caregivers, and assessment of patient resources); (2) collaboration and roles within care teams; (3) within-session communication techniques; (4) knowledge-base and the influence of experience; (5) medical and safety considerations; and (6) balancing institutional priorities within treatment. We created a concept map showing connections across these six factors.ConclusionThe process of making decisions about therapy time and organization of care within inpatient rehabilitation settings is complex and requires integration of multiple factors. Therapists usually prefer familiar approaches to complex or time-intensive ones, and local culture shapes decision-making norms. Future research may examine how these factors relate to patient outcomes and implementation of practice changes such as introduction of new evidence-based treatments or assessment tools.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingInpatientsRehabilitation CentersHumansattitude of health personnelClinical decision-makinghospitalsproblem solvingrehabilitationsubacute care

Identifiers

PMID41885302
PMCPMC13525182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.