ArticleClinical rehabilitation2026
Factors influencing clinical decision-making in inpatient rehabilitation: A scoping review.
Article in Clinical rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo synthesize research about clinical reasoning and decision-making among therapists in inpatient rehabilitation facilities about how they organize care and use their treatment time.Data sourcesPubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched for relevant empirical studies published prior to January 13, 2026.Review methodsScoping review. The review process was organized using Covidence. Included studies featured descriptions of clinical decisions explained by occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech therapists in inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Two reviewers coded the extracted themes through inductive analysis using Dedoose.ResultsOf 1239 articles identified through the search process, 51 met inclusion criteria. We identified six factors across studies that contributed to therapists' clinical decision-making including: (1) consideration of non-medical circumstances (with sub-themes of understanding the patient's perspective, presence of families and caregivers, and assessment of patient resources); (2) collaboration and roles within care teams; (3) within-session communication techniques; (4) knowledge-base and the influence of experience; (5) medical and safety considerations; and (6) balancing institutional priorities within treatment. We created a concept map showing connections across these six factors.ConclusionThe process of making decisions about therapy time and organization of care within inpatient rehabilitation settings is complex and requires integration of multiple factors. Therapists usually prefer familiar approaches to complex or time-intensive ones, and local culture shapes decision-making norms. Future research may examine how these factors relate to patient outcomes and implementation of practice changes such as introduction of new evidence-based treatments or assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.