ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2026
The colorectal cancer screening gap in Türkiye: A tripartite survey of barriers among patients and surgeons.
Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake in Türkiye remains suboptimal, despite the presence of a national screening program. Understanding whether barriers arise primarily from patient-related factors or system-level constraints is essential for effective policy planning. This study aimed to evaluate barriers to CRC screening across the screening pathway using patient, procedural, and provider perspectives. Material and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted between January and June 2025 at a tertiary training and research hospital. Three distinct groups were surveyed: 100 screening-naïve outpatients aged 50-70 years, 100 patients undergoing diagnostic or screening colonoscopy, and 50 general surgeons performing or referring for colonoscopy. Study-specific questionnaires, pilot-tested for clarity but not formally validated, were used to assess screening awareness, attitudes, perceived barriers, and strategies for improvement. The data were analyzed descriptively. Results: Among screening-naïve outpatients, 54% had no prior awareness of CRC screening, and only 28% had received a physician recommendation for screening. Fear of a serious diagnosis (45%) and pain or discomfort (40%) were commonly reported concerns; however, most respondents indicated that these would not deter screening. Among patients undergoing colonoscopy, 77% underwent the procedure for symptoms rather than preventive screening, while post-procedure satisfaction was high. Surgeons predominantly identified system-level barriers, particularly long waiting times (90%) and an insufficient number of trained endoscopists (92%), as major limitations in effective screening delivery. Conclusion: The primary perceived barrier to CRC screening in Türkiye appears to be limited system capacity rather than patient reluctance. Improving screening uptake will likely require coordinated public awareness efforts, structured national reminder systems, and expansion of the number of adequately trained endoscopists, alongside endoscopy infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.