Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41885219›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2026

The colorectal cancer screening gap in Türkiye: A tripartite survey of barriers among patients and surgeons.

Mustafa Oruç, Melih Bayazıtlı, İbrahim Kılınç, Erdinç Çetinkaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mustafa OruçClinic of General Surgery, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-7918-1689
Melih BayazıtlıClinic of General Surgery, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-1860-0704
İbrahim KılınçClinic of General Surgery, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-6926-6670
Erdinç ÇetinkayaDepartment of General Surgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-9249-1502

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake in Türkiye remains suboptimal, despite the presence of a national screening program. Understanding whether barriers arise primarily from patient-related factors or system-level constraints is essential for effective policy planning. This study aimed to evaluate barriers to CRC screening across the screening pathway using patient, procedural, and provider perspectives. Material and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted between January and June 2025 at a tertiary training and research hospital. Three distinct groups were surveyed: 100 screening-naïve outpatients aged 50-70 years, 100 patients undergoing diagnostic or screening colonoscopy, and 50 general surgeons performing or referring for colonoscopy. Study-specific questionnaires, pilot-tested for clarity but not formally validated, were used to assess screening awareness, attitudes, perceived barriers, and strategies for improvement. The data were analyzed descriptively. Results: Among screening-naïve outpatients, 54% had no prior awareness of CRC screening, and only 28% had received a physician recommendation for screening. Fear of a serious diagnosis (45%) and pain or discomfort (40%) were commonly reported concerns; however, most respondents indicated that these would not deter screening. Among patients undergoing colonoscopy, 77% underwent the procedure for symptoms rather than preventive screening, while post-procedure satisfaction was high. Surgeons predominantly identified system-level barriers, particularly long waiting times (90%) and an insufficient number of trained endoscopists (92%), as major limitations in effective screening delivery. Conclusion: The primary perceived barrier to CRC screening in Türkiye appears to be limited system capacity rather than patient reluctance. Improving screening uptake will likely require coordinated public awareness efforts, structured national reminder systems, and expansion of the number of adequately trained endoscopists, alongside endoscopy infrastructure.

Indexed as

Colonoscopycolorectal cancerpublic healthscreening

Identifiers

PMID41885219
PMCPMC13237512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.