Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41885091›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2026

Consolidation enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab after cisplatin induction in metastatic urothelial cancer: Outcomes of complete response and bladder preservation.

Kok Hoe Chan, Putao Cen, Tung Shu, Steven Canfield, Hui Zhao, Anneliese Gonzalez, Julie Rowe, Varaha Tammisetti, Hajar Ayoub, Angel Blanco and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kok Hoe ChanDivision of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2550-1122
Putao CenDivision of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA.
Tung ShuDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA.
Steven CanfieldDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA.
Hui ZhaoDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA.
Anneliese GonzalezDivision of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA.
Julie RoweDivision of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA.
Varaha TammisettiDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA.
Hajar AyoubDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA.
Angel BlancoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA.
Mark AmsbaughDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA.
Nizar TannirDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder preservation remains a highly desirable therapeutic goal in urothelial carcinoma, particularly when durable survival can be achieved. Radical cystectomy is the standard treatment for muscle-invasive disease; however, it results in irreversible bladder loss and significant morbidity. Among patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, recurrence rates after standard therapy remain high. Consolidation therapy with enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab following cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy has demonstrated promising efficacy, with substantial complete response rates and improved bladder preservation. This single-center retrospective analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab as consolidation therapy in 11 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who completed cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy. More than 90% of patients achieved a radiographic or clinical complete response, and several maintained prolonged treatment-free remission. Treatment-related adverse events, including dermatologic toxicity, reversible peripheral neuropathy, and hyperglycemia, were observed but were predominantly manageable, allowing treatment continuation in most cases. Notably, the regimen demonstrated clinical activity in cisplatin-intolerant patients and in those who did not achieve an initial complete response after cisplatin therapy. Compared with conventional cisplatin-based therapy alone, consolidation with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab was associated with favorable tolerability, durable responses, and a high rate of bladder preservation. These findings support further investigation of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab as a potential bladder-sparing strategy in advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Transitional CellCisplatinUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedConsolidation ChemotherapyFemaleHumansInduction ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPathologic Complete ResponseRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCisplatinenfortumab vedotinpembrolizumabbladder preservationEnfortumab vedotinpembrolizumaburothelial cancer

Identifiers

PMID41885091
PMCPMC13031760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.