ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2026
Optimizing antimicrobial stewardship during operational upheaval: lessons in resiliency from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic caused unprecedented operational stress on hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP). We utilized a systems engineering framework to characterize multi-level systems challenges to and strategies for resilient, hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) during the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsUsing a national data set, we identified hospitals that had significant COVID-19 burden. We conducted semi-structured interviews with pharmacists, physicians and quality leaders involved in ASPs during the pandemic at those hospitals. Interview guides were developed using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using deductive content analysis.
resultsWe interviewed 37 participants from 22 different healthcare systems across the country. Challenges to resilient ASP included physician employment model; limited AMS resources; staff shortages due to illness; shift in priorities; increased workload; remote work; and therapeutic momentum. Preexisting strategies to promote resilient AMS included system-wide AMS; decentralized AMS; excellent interprofessional relationships; strong culture of AMS and embracing incremental change. Real-time response strategies included ability to prioritize well; consistency with AMS work; being flexible and adopting change; intensifying infectious disease engagement; dedication to the profession; and reliance on automated tools and technology.
conclusionUsing a systems engineering informed qualitative approach, participants identified many modifiable challenges to AMS resiliency. Given the unfortunate reality that infectious disease pandemics and periods of operational stress are likely to occur in the future, we recommend that healthcare system leadership utilize the preexisting and real-time response strategies identified in this manuscript as a roadmap to ASP preparedness and a more proactive future response.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.