Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41885049›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2026

Miscarriage Care Practices in Taiwan: Three Reproductive Apparatuses.

Li-Wen Shih, Celia Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Li-Wen ShihGraduate Institute of Medical Humanities, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5428-238X
Celia RobertsSchool of Sociology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6103-3514

Funding

National Science and Technology Council MOST 107-2410-H038-005-MY2National Science and Technology Council MOST 109-2629-H-038-002-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing sociological studies of miscarriage, typically undertaken in Euro-American contexts, describe its ambiguous and uncertain character, arguing that pregnancy loss puts both pregnant people and foetuses into a liminal position. Based on 28 interviews and 24 participant drawings, this paper contributes to and challenges this literature by focusing on pregnancy loss in Taiwan. Our analysis reveals three reproductive apparatuses addressing miscarriage: biomedicine, Taiwanese Chinese medicine (TCM) and folk healthcare. We show that although biomedicine is the dominant apparatus, many Taiwanese who have experienced miscarriage also visit TCM clinics and engage in folk healthcare practices, even when they do not necessarily 'believe' in these. We argue that both TCM and folk healthcare blame women for miscarriage, whereas biomedicine fails to acknowledge the emotional significance of this experience. Viewed together, the three reproductive apparatuses reflect both the ambiguity and uncertainty surrounding miscarriage and women's complex labour in negotiating multiple understandings of pregnancy loss. Such specificities notwithstanding, our argument highlights the importance of attending to the practices, thoughts and feelings-both within and outside biomedicine-of those experiencing pregnancy loss in trying to sociologically understand this common, often devastating, experience.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousMedicine, Chinese TraditionalAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPregnancyTaiwandrawing as methodfolk healthcaremiscarriagepregnancy losssocial studies of reproductionsociology of healthTaiwanTaiwanese Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID41885049
PMCPMC13019418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.