ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
"I Believe in You": Student Experiences of Faculty Empathy in Health Sciences Education.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modeling Behavioral Determinants of Following and Verifying AI-Generated Health Advice: The Roles of eHealth Literacy, Cognitive Load, and Technology Self-Efficacy.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Faculty empathy, defined as perceptions of the students about the capacity of academic teaching staff's to recognize, understand, and respond sensitively to students' academic and emotional needs within non-clinical educational settings, remains underexplored in health sciences education. While empathy has been widely examined in clinical training, far less is known about how empathic behaviors enacted by faculty in classroom contexts shape students' motivation, engagement, and academic identity. Thus, this study aimed to explore undergraduate health sciences students' perceptions of faculty empathy, identify its impact on their academic engagement and well-being, and examine specific behaviors students perceived as empathetic or non-empathetic. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted with 16 undergraduate students (N = 16) from four academic programs at the University of Hail, Saudi Arabia. Participants submitted reflective essays describing personal experiences with faculty empathy or its absence. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase thematic analysis framework, following manual coding and pre-established trustworthiness strategies, including peer debriefing and audit trails. Results: Sixteen undergraduate health sciences students, representing four academic programs and diverse academic stages from first year to internship, contributed reflective essays. Analysis revealed four interrelated themes: (1) Empathy as a Catalyst for Academic Motivation, (2) The Emotional Consequences of Empathic Failure, (3) Faculty as Role Models and Academic Anchors, and (4) The Transformative Power of Supportive Communication. Students described both the empowering impact of empathetic faculty and the emotional harm caused by neglectful behaviors. Empathy fostered motivation, belonging, and self-efficacy, while its absence led to distress and disengagement. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that faculty empathy expressed through encouragement, recognition, and respectful engagement plays a decisive role in shaping students' academic experiences in non-clinical settings. Conversely, empathic failure may contribute to disengagement and emotional distress. These results underscore the need to intentionally integrate empathic practices into faculty development and institutional teaching cultures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.