Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41884864›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026

"I Believe in You": Student Experiences of Faculty Empathy in Health Sciences Education.

Anas Ali Alhur, Felipe Fregni, Muneef M Alsahmmari, Cristina Naqui, Danica Anne Sims

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anas Ali AlhurDepartment of Health Informatics, College of Public Health and Health Informatics, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6044-7072
Felipe FregniDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital and Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Muneef M AlsahmmariDepartment of Health Informatics, College of Public Health and Health Informatics, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Cristina NaquiMaternity and Pediatrics Unit, Hospital General de Granollers, Barcelona, Spain.
Danica Anne SimsDepartment of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Faculty empathy, defined as perceptions of the students about the capacity of academic teaching staff's to recognize, understand, and respond sensitively to students' academic and emotional needs within non-clinical educational settings, remains underexplored in health sciences education. While empathy has been widely examined in clinical training, far less is known about how empathic behaviors enacted by faculty in classroom contexts shape students' motivation, engagement, and academic identity. Thus, this study aimed to explore undergraduate health sciences students' perceptions of faculty empathy, identify its impact on their academic engagement and well-being, and examine specific behaviors students perceived as empathetic or non-empathetic. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted with 16 undergraduate students (N = 16) from four academic programs at the University of Hail, Saudi Arabia. Participants submitted reflective essays describing personal experiences with faculty empathy or its absence. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase thematic analysis framework, following manual coding and pre-established trustworthiness strategies, including peer debriefing and audit trails. Results: Sixteen undergraduate health sciences students, representing four academic programs and diverse academic stages from first year to internship, contributed reflective essays. Analysis revealed four interrelated themes: (1) Empathy as a Catalyst for Academic Motivation, (2) The Emotional Consequences of Empathic Failure, (3) Faculty as Role Models and Academic Anchors, and (4) The Transformative Power of Supportive Communication. Students described both the empowering impact of empathetic faculty and the emotional harm caused by neglectful behaviors. Empathy fostered motivation, belonging, and self-efficacy, while its absence led to distress and disengagement. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that faculty empathy expressed through encouragement, recognition, and respectful engagement plays a decisive role in shaping students' academic experiences in non-clinical settings. Conversely, empathic failure may contribute to disengagement and emotional distress. These results underscore the need to intentionally integrate empathic practices into faculty development and institutional teaching cultures.

Indexed as

academic engagementfaculty empathyhealth sciences educationstudent reflections

Identifiers

PMID41884864
PMCPMC13012168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.