ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Beyond rejection: engineering immune responses to redefine skin graft survival.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin grafting remains a fundamental reconstructive technique in reconstructive and dermatologic surgery for restoring skin integrity following burns, trauma, chronic ulcers, and excision of malignancies. However, a graft survival rate is determined by multiple factors and by a delicate balance between inflammatory and reparative immune system processes. Controlled inflammation promotes wound healing while excessive or prolonged immune activation has the potential to result in cytotoxicity and complement activation which will eventually lead to graft rejection. Early rejection is driven by antibody-meditated complement cascade and innate effector cells like macrophages and natural killer (NK) cells while long-term graft rejection often results from T cell-mediated cytotoxicity and alloantibody production. Molecular mediators such as reacting oxygen species, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) further amplify tissue injury and prevent healing. Current immunosuppressive therapies like calcineurin inhibitors and different corticosteroids reduce rejection to a certain level and are limited by systemic toxicity and impaired wound healing. Emerging strategies including bioengineered scaffolds, localized cytokine inhibitors, and stem cell-derived factors offer targeted immunomodulation to enhance graft tolerance and long-term survival. Despite promising preclinical data, translation into humans and application of the new emerging therapies remain constrained by species differences, ethical considerations, and variability in patient immune profiles. Advancing humanized models, biomaterial-based therapies, and precision immunotherapy will be pivotal in optimizing graft outcomes. This review aims to highlight how strategic modulation of inflammatory pathways can predict better graft outcomes and pave the way for next-generation regenerative therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.