ArticleSAGE open nursing
Enhancing ICU Nurse Redeployment Practices: A Qualitative Improvement Study of Support Interventions.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nurse redeployment is the movement of staff from their usual area of work to another area in response to staff shortage or increased care needs. A primary study examining the experiences of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) nurses reveals negative perceptions and challenges associated with redeployment. This quality improvement study is conducted to address gaps in areas of practice that are little understood and significantly impact patients and staff. This study aims to explore interventions to improve ICU staff experience during redeployment to other clinical areas. Methods: Purposive convenience sampling and qualitative interviews were conducted following the implementation of recommended interventions from the primary study. All participants who completed two buddy redeployment shifts were eligible to participate in the interviews. An external qualitative nurse researcher conducted semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using an inductive analysis method, and the COREQ guidelines were used for reporting. Results: Data analysis showed major themes of communication challenges, risks, emotional burden, and perspective. The subthemes highlighted the need for better communication due to lack of information clarity and instruction uncertainty, a clear escalation plan to raise issues and concerns, workload imbalance due to task uncertainty, task division, and negative comments, emotional challenges resulting in negative sentiments and staff views that were not considered during the redeployment planning process due to a lack of feedback and suggestions. Conclusion: The findings indicated that though efforts were made to improve the redeployment experience for ICU nursing staff through information and education, the challenges and gaps between an exposure buddy shift to gain a targeted understanding of the ward's workflow, compared to a structured orientation process, are significant. Further research on an orientation process and adequate resourcing before redeploying ICU staff to other units should be conducted and analyzed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.