ArticleKidney medicine2026
Machine Learning Predictions for Assessing Hard-to-Place Deceased Donor Kidneys.
Article in Kidney medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rationale & Objective: Nearly 20% of deceased donor kidneys in the United States are placed "out-of-sequence" (ie, outside of standard allocation rules). The rationale for out-of-sequence placements is to expedite placement of kidneys at risk of nonuse. We aimed to (1) develop machine learning (ML) models to predict the risk of kidney nonuse over time during the allocation process and (2) use the ML predictions to assess current out-of-sequence placements. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data. Setting & Participants: Deceased donors with at least one kidney recovered for transplant between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2023 (25,785 donors; 51,320 kidneys). Predictor: Clinical information available at distinct time points throughout the allocation process (donor medical history, biopsy, and center refusal patterns). Outcome: Probability of kidney nonuse. Analytical Approach: We trained ML models, evaluating area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, and other metrics. Feature importance was assessed using Gini impurity. We compared predicted nonuse probabilities across kidneys by outcome (in-sequence, out-of-sequence, not used), conditioned on the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI). Results: Adding refusal information up to clamp time performs better than a model that uses biopsy but no refusal information (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.90 vs 0.88). Center refusal information by time of prediction was among the most important predictors. Donors with out-of-sequence placements had intermediate predicted nonuse probabilities between donors with in-sequence placements and donors with unused kidneys. ML models were able to discriminate hard-to-place kidneys within each KDPI strata. Limitations: Incomplete data on out-of-sequence placements. Conclusions: ML can identify kidneys at high risk of nonuse before biopsy data become available and better than the KDPI. Overall, ML can provide real-time, data-driven tools to identify hard-to-place kidneys, offer a standardized and transparent way to guide accelerated placement and evaluate current practices, and ultimately reduce organ wastage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.