ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Management: Analysis of a National Single-payer System.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common entrapment neuropathy. Prior studies have documented racial and ethnic disparities in use of carpal tunnel release (CTR), but few have examined differences in the use of both operative and nonoperative treatments and differences in an equal-access healthcare system. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 366,009 veterans diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome across the Veterans Health Administration from 2010 to 2020. We assessed the association of race/ethnicity with receipt of CTR, surgical consultation, nonoperative management modalities, and time to treatment using multilevel logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Predictors included demographic, clinical, structural, and care process variables. Results: Among the study cohort, 12.7% underwent CTR within 2 years. After adjustment, Black and Hispanic veterans had significantly lower odds of receiving CTR compared with White veterans (Black: odds ratio 0.61; Hispanic: odds ratio 0.80). Similar trends were observed for surgical consultation, although the magnitude of disparity was attenuated. Time-to-event analyses showed prolonged time to surgical consultation and CTR for Black and Hispanic veterans compared with White veterans. Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to receive nonoperative treatments, including splinting and specific therapeutic modalities. Conclusions: Despite the Veterans Health Administration's equal-access model, significant racial and ethnic differences exist in surgical consultation, receipt of CTR, and timeliness of care. These differences seem to emerge across the surgical care continuum and are not fully explained by clinical or structural factors. Interventions targeting pre- and perioperative processes are needed to ensure equitable surgical care delivery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.