Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41884731›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of dermatology

Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria and Associated Risk-Factors-An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study.

Indrashis Podder, Arunima Dhabal, Himel Mondal, Sankha Subhra Chakraborty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Indrashis PodderFrom the Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Arunima DhabalDepartment of Dermatology, Jagannath Gupta Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Himel MondalDepartment of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
Sankha Subhra ChakrabortyDepartment of Pharmacology, Barasat Government Medical College and Hospital, Barasat, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a persistent low-grade inflammatory condition, which may be associated with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Objective: To estimate the prevalence of MetS in CSU patients and identify associated risk factors. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study including 74 CSU patients and 58 age-and-sex-matched healthy controls. Disease duration was assessed in all CSU patients along with disease activity and control using the UAS7 and UCT scores respectively. MetS was diagnosed by NCEP-ATP III criteria in all study participants. Additional biochemical parameters included absolute eosinophil and basophil counts. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), mean platelet volume (MPV), and serum total IgE, to identify potential risk factors for MetS. Results: CSU patients (mean age 35.4 ± 11.5 years, M: F 36:38) showed a higher prevalence of MetS, vs. healthy controls (mean age 31.9 ± 9.7 years, M: F 20:38), although statistically comparable [cases vs. controls 24.3% vs. 20.7%, Conclusion: MetS is more prevalent in CSU patients compared to healthy controls, although statistically comparable. All CSU patients need screening for underlying MetS, independent of their disease characteristics. Notably, higher age at presentation, higher total serum IgE, higher MPV, and raised FBS may aggravate the risk for MetS.

Indexed as

Chronic spontaneous urticariametabolic syndromeprevalencerisk factors

Identifiers

PMID41884731
PMCPMC13012752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.