Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41884648›Full record

ArticleAllergologie select2026

Experts' perspectives on allergic reactions to emerging food sources, pollen and insects.

Lea Faust, Sabine Dölle-Bierke, Veronika Höfer, Margitta Worm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergologie select, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lea FaustDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy, Campus Charité Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, and.
Sabine Dölle-BierkeDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy, Campus Charité Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, and.
Veronika HöferDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy, Campus Charité Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, and.
Margitta WormDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy, Campus Charité Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising demand for sustainable diets has led to an increased consumption of alternative protein sources. While ecologically promising, these foods may pose new allergenic risks. We surveyed 127 European allergy experts regarding their clinical perception towards emerging allergenic food sources. Allergic reactions to non-priority allergenic foods were most frequently reported for legumes (83%), followed by hemp (33%), edible insects (21%), and jackfruit (20%). Experts highlighted risks related to cross-reactivity, particularly between edible insects and crustaceans or house dust mites, and between non-priority legumes and peanut, soy, or lupine. Legumes other than peanut, soy, and lupine, as well as edible insects and hempseeds/cannabis, were also rated as most clinically relevant for future practice. Experts also noted rising symptoms due to changes in pollen exposure and insect distribution linked to climate change. Our data underscore the need for the diagnosis of emerging allergenic sources.

Indexed as

cross-reactivityedible insectsfood allergenshemp seedsjackfruitlegumesnovel allergenic food

Identifiers

PMID41884648
PMCPMC13010207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.