ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2026
Mathematical modeling for analyzing mass drug administration operational factors for efficient malaria incidence reduction in southern Senegal.
Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mass drug administration (MDA) has emerged as a promising strategy for reducing malaria incidence in many African countries. A pilot study of MDA in the Tambacounda health district in southeastern Senegal had a significant impact on reducing the malaria burden. This led the Senegalese National Malaria Control Program (NMCP) to consider scaling up MDA to the district level. However, the infrequent use of MDA has resulted in limited knowledge of its use in the specific context of Senegal. In this work, we propose a mathematical model based on impulsive differential equations that integrates asymptomatic carriers to analyze the impact of MDA on malaria incidence in the region. To this end, we explore four different scenarios of MDA operational factors: 1) the number of MDA rounds, 2) the time interval between rounds, 3) the campaign coverage, and 4) the campaign start date. We find that MDA operational factors should not be oversimplified, as they play a critical role in the effectiveness of MDA campaigns. Our model predicts that successful MDA campaigns are obtained with high MDA coverage, multiple rounds within a year, an interval of five to six weeks between rounds, and an intervention that starts in the first month of the transmission period (mid-to-late July). In addition, we find that the starting campaign date and the interval between are highly correlated. These findings suggest that outcomes of MDA campaigns can be improved by optimizing operational factors for specific malaria-endemic settings. When implementing multiple MDA rounds, it is crucial to optimize these factors so that the intervention covers the entire period of high transmission and reaches most of the target population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.