ArticleBrain communications2026
The lesion correlates of impaired content word fluency during spoken discourse in aphasia.
Article in Brain communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human conversations are strongly dependent on the production of informative and fluent connected speech. In people with aphasia, this skill is affected to varying degrees, which can negatively impact social communication and quality of life. However, available coding systems to assess connected speech production based on discourse tasks are labour-intensive and very time-consuming, limiting their utilization in clinical and research contexts. In this study, we investigated and further validated a recently developed, accurate, time-efficient and clinically applicable measure of content word fluency (CWF) during spoken discourse in a large, unselected sample of 76 participants with chronic aphasia following left hemisphere stroke. We report the first identification of lesion correlates of impaired content word production in spoken discourse using state-of-the-art lesion-symptom mapping methods, including voxel-wise disconnection, multivariate lesion-symptom mapping and tract-wise analyses. Discourse responses elicited using composite picture description were analysed using (i) CWF to assess content word production in spoken discourse using a pre-specified checklist without transcription or quantitative analysis and (ii) 'correct information unit' (CIU) following the standard transcription and quantitative analysis protocol of discourse samples. We showed a significant, strong positive correlation between CWF scores and the number of CIUs. Item Response Theory analysis revealed that the one-parameter logistic model best fits the data, indicating that items on the CWF checklist are homogeneously measuring a single underlying construct. Moreover, the items on the checklist were found to have distributed difficulties in the sample over a large functional range, indicating that the CWF approach is sensitive to variations in performance across a broad spectrum of aphasia severity. The neuroimaging findings indicated overlapping lesion correlates between CWF and CIU in the left frontal and parietal regions, and anterior dorsal white matter pathways, specifically the middle frontal gyrus, inferior parietal lobe, frontal aslant tract and superior longitudinal fasciculus. These results reveal strong convergence between CWF and CIU, and they provide behavioural, neurological and psychometric validation of the CWF approach, an efficient tool for assessing communication deficits in people with aphasia in both clinical and research settings. These insights have potential clinical implications, from improving targeted rehabilitation strategies to predicting recovery outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.