ReviewBladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Adjuvant immunotherapy for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma: Considerations for targeting patients.
Review in Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery represent mainstay treatments for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC), recurrence with lethal metastasis remains high and highlights the need for adjuvant therapies in MIUC, like immunotherapy, already in use for metastatic UC with favourable results. This review provides an overview of the key clinical trials investigating adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for MIUC and their clinical implications; in particular, examining factors that may be relevant in guiding adjuvant therapy to patients, such as ICI therapy choice, tumour subtype and the clinical utility of biomarkers, specifically PD-L1 status and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). Of the three key trials CheckMate-274, IMvigor010 and AMBASSADOR, anti-PD1 inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab have shown statistically significant improvements in disease-free survival (DFS) compared to controls, highlighting their promising use as seen with nivolumab's approval into clinical practice. Results are conflicting on the association of PD-L1 tumour expression with treatment outcome, yet ctDNA has emerged as a key biomarker from IMvigor010, showing not only prognostic value but also association between its clearance and atezolizumab treatment benefit derived. Notably, it remains uncertain across the trials whether adjuvant treatment efficacy differs by tumour origin (upper tract or lower tract disease), and larger subgroup numbers are needed for future trials in order to adequately assess statistical significance of speculative associations. Altogether, study findings support increasing clinical incorporation of adjuvant nivolumab and pembrolizumab into the MIUC setting, and emphasise ctDNA's utility as a biomarker for MIUC, demonstrating roles in both prognostication and prediction of treatment benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.