ReviewFrontiers in surgery2026
Fluorescence-guided ureter mapping in colorectal surgery: a systematic review of intraureteral ICG and emerging renal fluorophores.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Diverticular Disease: A Structured Review Across Clinical Settings and Operative Strategies.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Review
- Fluorescence ureteral navigation in laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure after aortic repair: a case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ureteral injury is a severe complication in colorectal surgery, with an incidence up to 2.5%. Despite meticulous surgical technique, intraoperative ureter identification can be challenging, particularly in cases involving prior operations or extensive inflammation. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has emerged as a promising adjunct to enhance ureter visualization. In parallel, novel fluorophores with renal excretion properties (e.g., CW800-CA, ZW800-1) are undergoing investigation to avoid routine ureteral catheterization. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy, safety, and clinical impact of ICG-based and emerging fluorescence approaches for ureter identification in colorectal surgery. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and Embase, up to March 2025, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies assessing intraoperative ureter identification via ICG fluorescence or other near-infrared fluorophores during adult colorectal surgery were included. Exclusion criteria comprised pediatric populations, non-colorectal procedures, reviews, editorials, and animal experiments. Primary outcomes were ureter visualization rate and intraoperative ureteral injury rate, while secondary outcomes included procedure-related complications, operative time, adverse effects, and preliminary cost data. Results: Ten studies comprising 716 patients undergoing colorectal surgery with ICG fluorescence imaging were analyzed. Ureter visualization rates ranged from 95.3% to 100%, with most studies reporting a rate of 100%. No ICG-related complications were documented. ICG administration was primarily via cystoscopy with intra-ureteral injection or ureteral catheterization, predominantly in laparoscopic and robot-assisted procedures. Mean duration of the cystoscopy varied from 7 to 29 min. Improved intraoperative ureter identification compared with conventional visualization was reported in available comparative studies. Conclusion: ICG fluorescence imaging safely and effectively enhances intraoperative ureter visualization during colorectal surgery, potentially reducing the risk of ureteral injuries. However, the need for routine ureteral catheterization prolongs procedure duration. Emerging renally excreted fluorophores may eliminate the need for catheterization and should be prioritized in future clinical trials. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO [CRD420250653992].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.