Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41884568›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026

Bibliometric mapping of artificial intelligence research in surgical education (1997-2025).

Jinlin Wu, Junfei Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jinlin Wu *Department of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Junfei Zhao *Department of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming surgical education, yet comprehensive analysis of research trends in this field remains limited. Methods: We analyzed publications from the Web of Science Core Collection using "surgery" AND "education" AND "artificial intelligence" as search terms (1997-2025). Bibliometric indicators were analyzed using the bibliometrix package in R. Results: We identified 572 publications by 3,228 authors across 332 journals, with an 18.39% annual growth rate. The United States and United Kingdom led research output, with Harvard University as the top contributing institution. "Augmented reality", "video", and "performance" emerged as mature research themes (motor themes), while large language models represent recent emerging topics. International collaboration accounted for 25.17% of publications, predominantly among developed nations. Citation analysis revealed human-robot interaction and AI-based simulation training as the most influential research topics. Conclusions: AI research in surgical education shows rapid growth but significant geographic disparities exist. Future efforts should focus on developing personalized learning systems and addressing the global digital divide in AI-enhanced surgical education.

Indexed as

AIartificial intelligencebibliometricssurgerysurgical education

Identifiers

PMID41884568
PMCPMC13008694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.