ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The paradox of AI content labeling: how clarity influences information avoidance via cognitive dissonance on social platforms.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The rapid growth of AI-generated content (AIGC) on social media has led to the introduction of AI disclosure labels to enhance transparency; however, emerging technologies such as Sora2 make it difficult for users to discern synthetic from human-created content, presenting challenges for both users and platform designers. Methods: This study investigates how different AI labels (clear, ambiguous, and no label) affect user behavior, focusing on information avoidance. We performed two online experiments ( Results: We found that ambiguous AI labels functioned as heuristic barriers that significantly increased information avoidance compared to clear or no labels. Cognitive dissonance was identified as a key mediator, where conflicting information led to discomfort and subsequent disengagement. Furthermore, factors such as label-content congruence and thematic relevance moderated these impacts. Discussion: These findings suggest that while AI disclosure labels are intended to improve transparency, ambiguous labels may inadvertently hinder user engagement, offering important implications for the design of transparency tools in AI-driven social media environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.