ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Comparative anthropomorphism and affective valence shape role perception and relational behaviours in human-pet dyads in Romania.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the association between attitudes toward animals, anthropomorphic tendencies, and beliefs about the social role of companion animals (cats and dogs) in the household. We hypothesised that beliefs about the social role of companion animals are shaped both by general attitudes toward animals, including opinions about the emotional and cognitive abilities of the animals, and by a higher tendency to anthropomorphise expressed by pet owners. We investigated behavioural expressions, such as communication and reconciliation with the animal, and perceived social support as relational outcomes between owners and their pets. Data were collected via questionnaires from a sample of 445 cat and dog guardians from Romania, where cultural norms around companion animals are under-researched. The findings indicate that anthropomorphic thinking is a stronger predictor of the perceived social role of the pet in the familial structure than general attitudes toward animals. Moreover, our findings indicate that pet role perception partially mediates the relational outcomes: participants who ascribed their pets a more influential social role reported a higher level of communicative and reconciliatory behaviour, as well as greater social support. This study also explores the valence of anthropomorphic attribution, whether positive, negative, or mixed. The findings reflect that participants vary in the attribution of exclusively positive, exclusively negative, or mixed qualities to their pets. These results highlight nuanced psychological processes that are shaping the emotional and behavioural landscape of human-pet relationships, and can be further integrated in educational contexts, including preparation for adoption, fostering and pet management programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.